The numbers look miraculous.
Contrary to some other analyses, the JLF and its Massachusetts partner find that total taxes paid by every income group will be lower in 2015 than they would have without the reform. Specifically, they estimate that
- households with incomes below $25,000 will save a total of $79 million,
- households with incomes of $25,000 to $50,000 will save $68 million,
- households with incomes of $50,000 to $75,000 will save $58 million,
- households with incomes of $75,000 to $100,000 will save $78 million,
- households with incomes of $100,000 to $200,000 will save $201 million, and
- households with incomes above $200,000 will save $369 million.
The miraculous part is that numbers suggest that the NC tax changes provide average tax savings across the income distribution.
However, there's just a teensy, weensy problem with the analysis--the numbers don't add up. Or rather, the estimated $853 million in total JLF savings across income groups in 2015 adds to far more than the anticipated savings from NC's official budget analysis.
The report claims to rely on many figures and estimates provided by the Fiscal Research Division of the NC General Assembly. But the FRD calculated that the tax package would only reduce revenues by $501 million in fiscal year that runs July 2014-June 2015 and $760 million in the fiscal year that runs from July 2015-June 2016. Thus, the 2015 calendar year savings would be somewhere between $501 and $760 million.
Yet the JLF and its Massachusetts partner find $853 million in savings.
Talk about your Massachusetts miracles!
Update (2/12/14, 2:15 p.m.): The JLF/Beacon Hill numbers have become more miraculous.
The FRD estimates that state revenues will drop $501-$760 million in 2015. However, the funds coming from taxpayers' pockets will only fall $434 to $706 million because the expansion of the sales tax also increases local government tax receipts.
Also, the JLF/Beacon Hill estimates don't treat the elimination of the state Earned Income Tax Credit as tax reform (low-income families are likely to see things differently). The elimination of the state EITC will cost low-income households at least $100 million per year.
These changes add more than $150 million to the discrepancy between the JLF/Beacon Hill numbers and the official state projections.